Hamlet 2000
Review Date: September 2, 2000
Director: Michael Almereyda
Producers: Andrew Fierberg,Amy Hobby
Starring:
- Ethan Hawke
- Kyle McLachlan
- Diane Venora
- Julia Stiles
- Bill Murray
PLOT:
When I first heard about Michael Almereyda's new film
version of HAMLET, I was certainly looking forward to it, even if it did
star Ethan Hawke. The thought of making a multimedia for the new
millennium, set in the cutthroat corporate world of New York City, had
me frothing at the mouth like Cujo at a children's day care center.
I'm sure almost everyone is familiar to some degree with
arguably the most famous English-language play ever written, but for
posterity's sake I'll divulge a little bit of the plot. As stated
earlier, it's set in modern-day NYC, where Claudius (Kyle MacLachlan)
has just assumed control of the Denmark Corporation. This vexes his
nephew Hamlet (Ethan Hawke), who is understandably pissed at the fact
that his mother Gertrude (Diane Venora) has married her own
brother-in-law not two months after the death of her husband (Sam
Shepard). Not only that, Hamlet suspects some foul goings-on in the
air, a feeling which is confirmed by the ghost of his late father, who
relates a horrible tale of familial murder.
With the help of his friend Horatio (Karl Geary), Hamlet
sets about trying to prove his uncle's guilt. At the same time, his
relationship with his girlfriend Ophelia (Julia Stiles) takes a turn for
the worst, thanks in no small part to the machinations of her
long-winded uncle Polonius (Bill Murray), Claudius' trusted advisor.
Claudius, for his part, sends two of Hamlet's childhood friends,
Rosencrantz (Steve Zahn) and Guildenstern (Dechen Thurman), to spy on
his nephew, and report anything and everything. Needless to say, for
anyone who's read the play, things don't exactly turn
out all warm and fuzzy, mainly because pretty much everyone bites the
big one. That's why they call it tragedy, folks.
THE REVIEW:
I have to admit right off the bat, I was a little bit
disappointed with Almereyda's HAMLET. Not that it was absolutely
horrible; on the contrary, it was well-acted, and the ideas and visuals
were clearly stated. It just seemed too intentionally pretentious, like
some idiot film student came upon a camera and made it his goal to make
everything look as totally COOL as possible. I loved some of the ideas
with the multimedia, though. The scene in Blockbuster video, where
Hamlet does his "To be, or not to be" soliloquy, was amusing, as our
hero traipses through the action section (bringing to the fore the real
meaning behind the neverending babble of words that passes for great
English drama), and Hamlet's presentation of "The Mouse Trap" was
completely unexpected yet so obviously perfect at the same time. The
Blockbuster scene has another in-joke for film/Shakespeare fans, as
throughout the scene THE LION KING plays on the store's video screens
(said film being a Disneyfied cartoon version of Shakespeare's play).
The scene where Hamlet debates whether or not to kill Claudius while
he's in confession is restaged to admirable effect in a limousine.
Hawke, I have to admit, didn't embarrass himself in the most
highly regarded role for an actor, although he didn't really impress me
too much either. I really liked Bill Murray as Polonius, though. He
has the character of the pompous windbag nailed, and he can speak
Shakespeare's speech trippingly on the tongue. Liev Schreiber, whom I
know mainly from the SCREAM trilogy, is far from the schlock-horror
genre here, and acquits himself ably. The rest of the cast is solid,
especially Steve Zahn and Dechen Thurman, whose job it was to make
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as annoying as possible. Well, it worked.
By the time they accompanied Hamlet on the plane, I was
wishing Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were dead.
For a film that attempts to be visually innovative, it's
worth noting how little Almereyda has actually improved upon other
versions. The high-water mark for HAMLET films is still Kenneth
Branagh's four-hour version from 1996. You'd think that, for a film
that tries to be newfangled and controversial, Almereyda would go over
the top with the visual references (like Baz Luhrmann's version of ROMEO
+ JULIET), but aside from a couple of scenes, it's remarkably low-key.
I was also hoping for an ending that had been tweaked a little. After
all, who fences anymore?
THE BOTTOM LINE:
Nevertheless, thanks to the story (which, thanks to its
potency, has survived for four hundred years), this HAMLET still rises
above the majority of films written in this day and age. It's worth
checking out just for its unique multimedia setting. The fact that the
story is so familiar (having been filmed about 1,576 times before)
offsets the modern-day telling, and makes what may seem like an
avant-garde experiment feel a little more mainsteam than it should.
It's worth a rental, though. Just try not to walk through the action
section quoting Shakespeare as I did, or you may get strange looks. ***1/2 stars
- Matt Easterbrook
( Matt's Movie Reviews )