Write a Review

G.I. Joe: Retaliation movie reviews

• 2

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Saturday, April 20, 2013 7:08:48 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  The movie was trash, please don't waste your money on this film. The plot was terrible and the action was mediocre, Willis at his worst.

• 10

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:31:08 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  This and Scary Movie 5 are representative of modern filmmaking at its finest.

• 1

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Wednesday, April 17, 2013 5:08:38 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Crap! Brainless crap. Well-suited for the impaired of mind and persons with an IQ of 50 and lower.

• 2

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Friday, April 12, 2013 9:16:20 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  Do not waist your money I felt like I was watching a power rangers cartoon The plot was poorly written and confuseing The 3d was hard on the eyes the hole movie was stuped I don't know how they got the rock and bruce willis ot even read the script let alone star in it!

• 6

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Friday, April 12, 2013 2:41:33 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  I would give this a 3.5, but they don't give you this choice. Not bad, but I found it not a G.I. Joe movie, but a Rock and Bruce Willis action movie that happened to have Joe characters in it. Thank God thye didn't give up Snakeeyes

• 9

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:06:27 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F

  I liked how i it had a lot of action in it and it wasnt boring at all

• 2

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Wednesday, April 10, 2013 8:52:34 AM | (age group: 50 or over.) | M

  Watched About 20 minutes of the film and left , to much action. Lack of visable stars from original film , would have been a lot better with them. Story line ? What Story Line. First Film Was one hundred percent better And What Actors Were in Thins one Were Poorly Used. Especially The Rock And Bruce Willis , They Must Have Been Hurting For Cash To Play The Rolls They Did

• 1

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Wednesday, April 10, 2013 8:35:41 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  This movie was absolutely horrible. The only saving grace was the special effects and a few of the action scenes. The storyline is not remotely plausible - all countries launching their nuclear warheads at the same time, then self destructing them in mid flight. The script seemed like it was written by a teenager in a hurry to finish their homework so they could go out and smoke up some more. The acting was so cheesy and subpar (due to the poorly written script and ridiculous storyline). I would have giving the first GI Joe a 6/10. This second GI Joe gets a GENEROUS 2/10 from me.

• 7

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Wednesday, April 10, 2013 2:33:50 AM | (Age Not Specified)

  It was good to pretty good. One reviewer said the movie in 3D almost ruined it for him. Me too!! I didn't like it in 3D. This type of movie is Not suited to Be in 3D at all!! Another reviewer said they didnt like Mr. Channing in it. Neither did I. How many movies has he been in the last few years?? WOW. I go to a movie if he's in it. BUT would you please hire someone else who needs a job, more than him!! Thank you.

• 2

  G.I. Joe: Retaliation

  Monday, April 08, 2013 12:05:39 PM | (Age Not Specified)

  The action was good, but the story was total crap. Didn't make any sense. A weak story line. No country in the world launches all it nuke at the same time and then destroy it as well. That was so immature.